Choosing a Service Format That Actually Fits

When an investor approaches Costalice, they usually have a clear idea of the asset or coastal area they want to evaluate. What is not always defined is the most suitable service format for their actual situation. A full feasibility study is not the best option for someone who only needs a quick cash flow projection, nor does an isolated valuation resolve the doubts of someone planning a phased development.

The key is to align the scope of the work with the moment of the decision. For a buyer comparing three commercial plots in Hato Mayor, a comparative valuation report with occupancy scenarios may be sufficient. In contrast, for a hotel group evaluating the construction of a convention center on the coast, an economic feasibility study with sensitivity analysis is practically mandatory.

In practice, the three most requested formats are: the specific consultation (a report with a concrete question, such as the market price of an asset), the partial study (cash flow projection or operating cost analysis without including the land valuation), and the comprehensive study (full feasibility with 10-year projections, risk identification, and optimization plan). Each has a different cost and timeline, but the important thing is that the client does not pay for analysis they will not use.

Therefore, before starting any work, we review the investment context together: whether there is a deadline, whether the asset is already in the purchase process, or whether the report is needed to present to a partner or a bank. That conversation defines the format and avoids surprises. In the end, a well-adjusted service not only saves money but also accelerates decision-making.